
What is a Community of Practice?
You are building something that matters. You spend your days navigating the complexities of operations, payroll, and strategy, all while trying to keep the vision alive. One of the nagging fears that keeps many business owners up at night is the worry that critical knowledge is trapped in silos. You might have a brilliant problem solver in engineering and a creative thinker in customer support, but because they are on different teams, their collective intelligence never intersects. You worry that your organization is reinventing the wheel because people simply are not talking to one another about how they do what they do.
This is where the concept of a Community of Practice enters the conversation. It is not just another corporate buzzword or a rebranding of a weekly meeting. It is a specific structural approach to learning that can alleviate the anxiety of stagnant growth and disconnected teams. It offers a way to harness the collective expertise that already exists within your walls but remains untapped.
Defining the Community of Practice
A Community of Practice, or CoP, is defined as a group of people who share a concern or a passion for something they do and learn how to do it better as they interact regularly. Three specific elements must be present for a group to fit this definition.
- The Domain: This is the shared ground. It is not just a club of friends. It is a group with a shared identity defined by a shared domain of interest. Membership implies a commitment to the domain.
- The Community: Members engage in joint activities and discussions, help each other, and share information. They build relationships that enable them to learn from each other.
- The Practice: Members are practitioners. They develop a shared repertoire of resources which can include experiences, stories, tools, and ways of addressing recurring problems.
Community of Practice vs. Project Teams

It is easy to confuse a CoP with a standard project team, but the distinction is vital for a manager to understand. A project team is driven by deliverables and deadlines. It is usually assigned by management and dissolves once the task is complete. The goal is an output.
In contrast, a Community of Practice is often organic. It lasts as long as there is interest in maintaining the group. The goal is not a specific deliverable but rather the building of capability and knowledge. While a team focuses on completing a task, a CoP focuses on learning how to do that task better next time. Understanding this difference relieves the pressure to force a CoP to produce immediate, tangible metrics in the same way you would a sales team.
When to cultivate a Community of Practice
There are specific scenarios where encouraging these communities makes strategic sense for a growing business. You might notice that junior staff are struggling to learn the ropes because senior staff are too busy to mentor them one on one. A CoP allows for collective mentorship.
Perhaps you see different departments using different tools to solve the exact same problem, leading to waste and confusion. A CoP centered around that problem allows for standardization based on consensus rather than a top down mandate. These communities work best when the problem is complex and requires diverse perspectives.
The unknowns of the Community of Practice
While the benefits seem clear, there are questions we must ask ourselves as leaders. We do not yet have a perfect formula for how much leadership involvement is too much. If a manager interferes too heavily, the community loses its organic appeal and becomes another obligation. If leadership is absent, the community may lack the resources to meet.
We also struggle to measure the exact return on investment. How do you quantify a conversation that prevented a mistake six months down the line? These are the uncertainties you must navigate. You have to decide if you are comfortable investing in a structure where the results are qualitative and long term, rather than quantitative and immediate. It requires a leap of faith in your people and their desire to improve.







